As I have now finished the film, I would like to evaulate the film and the project as a whole.
The Intial Idea and Pre-Production:
The basic idea of this project was representing political ideologies as characters, whilst drawing visual inspiration from the "Before I Forget" music video from Slipknot. This idea originally came out of a number of influences, for example the game Bioshock, but mostly it came from the ideas that came out of my context lessons on representation. I decided that I would use the ideas I explored in my context essay as the basis of this film project, which is why they share the same blog and research.
I wrote a script, based on these ideas, it featured four characters each representing a political ideology, I was happy with it but as the time to start filming approached I began to realise that the script was a little too ambitious and ultimately could do with a second draft. Whilst trying to think of how to streamline the script, the idea of filming from a first person perpective of a secondary character could put a unique twist on the film whilst also simplifing the production process. After writing a second draft I was far happier with the script and felt that I could confidently begin the production process.
The Production Process:
Originally I wanted to employ professional actors for my film, but while planning filming I soon decided against it. Despite knowing that the quality of the film may suffer, I decided that due to time constraints and the last minute nature of the project that it was better to focus on other, more important matters like location and equipment. Ulitmately it would have been nice to use professional actors but I really don't think the film suffers much at all from using non-professional actors.
For this project I really wanted make sure that everything was organised properly so that nothing went wrong. I made sure that everything that I needed was on hand and working and that everyone was avaliable for filming, and that we had a lot of time to spare, just in case any significant problems occured. I feel it is this careful approach that helped this project run so much smoother than previous ones who's results were effected by problems that could have easily been solved with careful preparetion.
Filming itself ran smoothly, no significant problems came up and any that did were easily solved. I also feel that the clam, collaborative and open enviroment helped make the film really improve, I think that being willing to hear someone else's suggestions and ideas are key to making and good film.
Post-Production:
In the edit the film really came into it's own. due to how smoothly the production stage went, I had more than enough time to edit and so was free to experiment more, which helped make the film improve more so. Again I welcomed the input of others and listened to their ideas.
One unplanned experiment that really paid off was the addition of atmosphere music and sound effects to the film, the music really added a whole new feel and mood to the footage and the sound effects helped make the film feel far more real.
After some feedback from Dan, I re-recorded some of the dialogue, some was much better re-recorded and some was better in the orginal footage. Being able to re-record dialogue was yet another benefit of having a lot of time to edit and also because of the de-focused visual style, lip-syncing dialogue wasn't a problem.
Thoughts on the Film:
I am very pleased with this film, I really feel that this is a big step up from previous films and the first film that I can show with pride as an example of my work. I feel that I have represented the ideas and beliefs of these ideologies well. I am pleased with the little references and attention to detail that went into the film. It's turned out far more brutal than I orginally intented, which I am also pleased.
Upon reflection there are a few things that could have been improved, for example professional actors may have been an improvement but honestly I don't really miss them when reveiwing the film. Ulitmately I am very pleased with this film and am eager to use similar techniques in future films, I feel it has more than achieved the goals I hoped to achieve.
Presentation:
The Presentation went well, feedback was mostly positive. There wasn't much that people thought that would improve the film. Dan and Andy had some suggestions, the main one being possibly adding echo or reverberation would help make the dialogue fit more and add to the strange atmosphere. But overall I was very please with people's feedback.
Monday, 21 May 2012
Sometimes filmmaking can be pleasant...
In regard to my film project, filming went surprisingly well, we didn't really encounter any huge problems. There was a small issue regarding colour noise but after some investigation and changing settings it didn't prove too much of a problem. Overall filming went quickly and efficiently, which provided alot of time for editing.
Editing went well, because I had a lot of time to edit I was able to experiment with the film a lot more which I feel helped improve the film. There were a few un-planned alterations that resulted from post-production experimentation, but the main one I feel was the addition of atmospheric music, which I stubbled across while searching from appropriate sound effects. After adding them to the film, I feel it improved the film greatly and added a strange and apropreate atmosphere.
After the initial edit was finished I showed Dan, he gave some pointers and advise, the main one about possibly re-recording some of the sound. I thought this was a good suggestion and re-recorded some oif the dialogue. Some was useful and some was better on the orginal footage.
I did encounter the problem of wanting to over edit the film, of feeling the need to improve it when it doesn't really need it, however after some feedback and some time away from the film I feel that this is certainly something I can be proud of.
I did however encounter some problems with exporting which I will try to resolve, I may talk to Stu about it but hopefully I won't need to.
Editing went well, because I had a lot of time to edit I was able to experiment with the film a lot more which I feel helped improve the film. There were a few un-planned alterations that resulted from post-production experimentation, but the main one I feel was the addition of atmospheric music, which I stubbled across while searching from appropriate sound effects. After adding them to the film, I feel it improved the film greatly and added a strange and apropreate atmosphere.
After the initial edit was finished I showed Dan, he gave some pointers and advise, the main one about possibly re-recording some of the sound. I thought this was a good suggestion and re-recorded some oif the dialogue. Some was useful and some was better on the orginal footage.
I did encounter the problem of wanting to over edit the film, of feeling the need to improve it when it doesn't really need it, however after some feedback and some time away from the film I feel that this is certainly something I can be proud of.
I did however encounter some problems with exporting which I will try to resolve, I may talk to Stu about it but hopefully I won't need to.
Sunday, 20 May 2012
Of ambition and second-drafts...
I'm sorry for not posting in a while, I've been preoccupied with writing, filming and editing so much so that this blog slipped my mind. With this in mind I think summing up what I have been up to and what has happened with the film project is in order.
As I have stated previously in the blog, I am using this as the research for two projects, my context essay and my film project. Because both are on the same subject, one leading into the other, I saw no reason to make two identical blogs on the same subject.
I have written and completed and handed in the essay, and am rather pleased with it. Following this I wrote the script for the film project, based on the conclusions I came to in the essay, in regard to how to represent my chosen political ideologies. It followed to story of four characters, each representing one of the ideologies and explores how each of them thinks, acts and interact with one another.
Although I was happy with the script I felt it was a little too ambitious and over all could do with a second draft. I was at this time that during a conversation with my friend Isaac that the idea of presenting the film from the perspective of the Librarian character a rose. Presenting the film from the perspective of a character who is slipping in and out of consciousness not only fitted in with the visual style that I wanted to use but also created a unique take on the story and ultimately a very interesting film, in my opinion. I wrote a second draft that was shorter, streamlined and presented form the first perspective and prepared for filming. Upon reflection I am certain that the film is much better since the second draft.
As I have stated previously in the blog, I am using this as the research for two projects, my context essay and my film project. Because both are on the same subject, one leading into the other, I saw no reason to make two identical blogs on the same subject.
I have written and completed and handed in the essay, and am rather pleased with it. Following this I wrote the script for the film project, based on the conclusions I came to in the essay, in regard to how to represent my chosen political ideologies. It followed to story of four characters, each representing one of the ideologies and explores how each of them thinks, acts and interact with one another.
Although I was happy with the script I felt it was a little too ambitious and over all could do with a second draft. I was at this time that during a conversation with my friend Isaac that the idea of presenting the film from the perspective of the Librarian character a rose. Presenting the film from the perspective of a character who is slipping in and out of consciousness not only fitted in with the visual style that I wanted to use but also created a unique take on the story and ultimately a very interesting film, in my opinion. I wrote a second draft that was shorter, streamlined and presented form the first perspective and prepared for filming. Upon reflection I am certain that the film is much better since the second draft.
Sunday, 22 April 2012
Your daily dose of Nietzsche.
Just a short post:
Whilst researching Fascism and Friedrich Nietzsche for my essay, I came across this rather interesting interview on the subject of Friedrich Nietzsche, which is very helpful when trying to understand Nietzsche's ideas. I find it wonderfully ironic that, considering Nietzsche's key idea is that "God is dead", his writings are often as hard to understand clearly as biblical texts.
Whilst researching Fascism and Friedrich Nietzsche for my essay, I came across this rather interesting interview on the subject of Friedrich Nietzsche, which is very helpful when trying to understand Nietzsche's ideas. I find it wonderfully ironic that, considering Nietzsche's key idea is that "God is dead", his writings are often as hard to understand clearly as biblical texts.
Sunday, 15 April 2012
"A bunch of bad apples"
I have just finished watching the documentary The Corporation. A very interesting documentary, well ballenced, containing the veiws of both critics of corporations and capitalism and corporate CEOs, overall a good documentary critising capitialism and large corporations basically ruling the world, however to me the most interesting part comes early on in the documentary.
First it explains how lawyers of large corporations were able to use laws originally meant to stop the government from depriving people of life, liberty or property without due legal process to aquire private propety and profit whilst no one person is ever held responisble, all based on corporations being considered a person legally, meaning they have all the rights a person does. The documentary follows this logic one step further, saying that if corporations are legaly considered a person and so are granted all the rights that a person is granted, then what kind of person are they? It proceeds to psychoanalyses the 'behaviour' of large corporations to determine their mental state.
First it explains how lawyers of large corporations were able to use laws originally meant to stop the government from depriving people of life, liberty or property without due legal process to aquire private propety and profit whilst no one person is ever held responisble, all based on corporations being considered a person legally, meaning they have all the rights a person does. The documentary follows this logic one step further, saying that if corporations are legaly considered a person and so are granted all the rights that a person is granted, then what kind of person are they? It proceeds to psychoanalyses the 'behaviour' of large corporations to determine their mental state.
After studying a number of casestudies and comparing the corporations' 'behaviour' against the DSM-IV's (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition) symtoms of psychopathy, namely: Callous unconcern for the feelings of others, Incapacity to maintain enduring relationships, Reckless disregard for the safety of others, Deceitfulness: repeated lying and conning others for profit, Incapacity to experience guilt, Failure to conform to social norms with respect to lawful behaviours, all of which had been displayed by the corporations studied, leading to the conclusion that corporations are psychopaths.
Since I am studying representing political ideologies as characters I am very interested in doing a similar to the study performed in the documentary on the ideologies I am studying. Below is the first in a series of videos that make up the free online version of the documentary:
Saturday, 14 April 2012
"All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others"
I have just finished reading George Orwell's Animal Farm. It's a great book and I highly recommend it but, like many political works of fiction, it isn't a pleasant nor fun read, but then it doesn't need to be and nor should it be.
The story tells of how the animals of Manor Farm rise up, overthrow their human masters and begin to run the farm themselves. However as time goes by what was originally a paradise were all animals are free soon turns into a nightmarish place were "all animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others."
The book is an allegorical tale of the Russian revolution and criticises soviet communism, and as such is full of characters, places and events that represent historical figures, peoples, places and events to do with the Russian revolution.
All in all, in regard to communism, the book seems to point out the same conclusion I came to after reading The Communist Manifesto, which is that although the basic ideas of equality and people working for the benefit of everyone are sound and overall positive ideas, in my opinion, the system that communism puts in place, where the state owns everything and everyone owns the state, is very open to corruption. It's easy for someone in power to abuse that power, a tale the world is all too familiar with, resulting in a society where some people suffer so others can benefit, which is exactly what communism seeks to destroy.
I found this a great read and a very helpful criticism of communism. Below are some links to some web pages where people explain/explore exactly what represented what in animal farm.
Animal Farm - Comparison of characters to the Russian Revolution
George Orwell - Animal Farm - Interpretation of characters and symbols
The story tells of how the animals of Manor Farm rise up, overthrow their human masters and begin to run the farm themselves. However as time goes by what was originally a paradise were all animals are free soon turns into a nightmarish place were "all animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others."
The book is an allegorical tale of the Russian revolution and criticises soviet communism, and as such is full of characters, places and events that represent historical figures, peoples, places and events to do with the Russian revolution.
All in all, in regard to communism, the book seems to point out the same conclusion I came to after reading The Communist Manifesto, which is that although the basic ideas of equality and people working for the benefit of everyone are sound and overall positive ideas, in my opinion, the system that communism puts in place, where the state owns everything and everyone owns the state, is very open to corruption. It's easy for someone in power to abuse that power, a tale the world is all too familiar with, resulting in a society where some people suffer so others can benefit, which is exactly what communism seeks to destroy.
I found this a great read and a very helpful criticism of communism. Below are some links to some web pages where people explain/explore exactly what represented what in animal farm.
Animal Farm - Comparison of characters to the Russian Revolution
George Orwell - Animal Farm - Interpretation of characters and symbols
Monday, 9 April 2012
"...and "Do what thou wilt" shall be the whole of the law."
Just finished reading Alan Moore's V for Vendetta as part of my research into representing political ideologies as characters. A great read and I highly recommend it.
For those who don't know and perhaps haven't had the good fortune to read this masterpiece, I'll quickly sum up the plot. Set in an alternate 1998 where following a war Great Britain has become a fascist state, controlled by a Nazi-esque political group call "Norsefire", it follows the story of Eve Hammond, a young prostitute who is saved and taken under the wing of the anarchistic terrorist known only as "V", who "educates" her whilst also carrying out an elaborate plot to take down the fascist regime and usher in a state of anarchy.
As I have said before, seeing as Alan Moore is a self-professed Anarchist, V for Vendetta is kinda Alan Moore's Ode to Anarchy, and as such a great source of research for me since it is an anarchist talking about anarchism as well as exploring fascism. Through the plot of the V for Vendetta Alan Moore talks about his beliefs regarding anarchy and fascism, exploring and questioning the morals of both.
[spoilers]
It questions the need for revolutionary violence and it's moral repercussions, after all V is a murderous terrorist, throughout the book he murders and bombs to achieve his goals. Interestingly Evey refuses to help V kill, "I won't do any more killing, V. Not even for you." - Eve, and in a marvellous monologue V explains how although violence is necessary to achieve his goals, it has no place within a "better world" and even goes so far as to organise his own execution because of what he has had to do to build a "better world".
It addresses the idea that once the established hierarchy has been toppled chaos, looting and rioting will ensue. Once V removes the government's ability to listen, watch and address the public, looting and rioting does occur. Pointing out what may be obvious to some, that once people think no-one is looking they stop behaving, however V makes a clear distinction between this chaos and anarchy. He argues that this kind of disorder is a necessary phase that society must endure so that a state of anarchy can be achieved.
"All this riot and uproor, V... is this anarchy? Is this the land of do-as-you-please?" - Eve
"No. This is only the land of take-what-you-want. Anarchy means "without leaders"; not "without order." With anarchy comes an age of ordnung, of true order, which is to say voluntary order. This age of ordnung will begin when the mad and incoherent cycle of verwirrung that these bulletins reveal has run its course. This is not anarchy, Eve. This is chaos." - V- page 195
It goes on to argue that societies based around involuntary order, by their very nature, cause disorder.
"Involuntary order breeds dissatisfaction, mother of disorder; parent of the guillotine. Authoritarian societies are like formation skating. Intricate, mechanically precise and above all precarious. Beneath civilisation's fragile crust, cold chaos churns and there are places where the ice is treacherously thin." - V - page 197
It says that it is up to the people to choose between freedom or selfishness, that only by cooperating will people be able to move forward and progress, to make a better world.
"The people stand within the ruins of a society, a jail intended to out livge them all. The door is open. They can leave, or fall instead to squabbling and thence new salveries, the choice is theirs, as ever it must be." - Eve - page 260
It also explores the motives of a number of the fascist characters, the most interesting and telling of which is present as an internal monologue of the leader, Adam Susan.
"My name is Adam Susan. I am the leader. Leader of the lost, ruler of the ruins. I am a man, like any other man. I lead the country that I love out of the wilderness of the twentieth century. I believe in survival. In the destiny of the Nordic race. I believe in fascism. Oh yes, I am a fascist. What of it? Fascism…a word. A word whose meaning has been lost in the bleatings of the weak and the treacherous. the Romans invented fascism. A bundle of bound twigs was its symbol. One twig could be broken. A bundle would prevail. Fascism…strength in unity. I believe in strength. I believe in unity. And if that strength, that unity of purpose, demands a uniformity of thought, word and deed then so be it. I will not hear talk of freedom. I will not hear talk of individual liberty. They are luxuries. I do not believe in luxuries. The war put paid to luxury. The war put paid to freedom. The only freedom left to my people is the freedom to starve. The freedom to die, the freedom to live in a world of chaos. Should I allow them that freedom? I think not. I think not. Do I deserve for myself the freedom I deny to others? I do not. I sit here within my cage and I am but a servant. I, who am master of all that I see I see desolation. I see ashes. I have so very much. I have so very little. I am not loved, I know that. Not in soul or body. I have never known the soft whisper of endearment. Never known the peace that lies between the thighs of woman. But I am respected. I am feared. And that will suffice. Because I love. I, who am not loved in return. I have a love that is far deeper than the empty gasps and convulsions of brutish coupling. Shall I speak of her? Shall I speak of my bride? She has no eyes to flirt or promise. But she sees all. Sees and understands with a wisdom that is Godlike in its scale. I stand at the gates of her intellect and I am blinded by the light within. How stupid I must seem to her. How childlike and uncomprehending. Her soul is clean, untainted by the snares and ambiguities of emotion. She does not hate. She does not yearn. She is untouched by joy or sorrow. I worship her though I am not worthy. I cherish the purity of her disdain. She does not respect me. She does not fear me. She does not love me. They think she is hard and cold, those who do not know her. They think she is lifeless and without passion. They do not know her. She has not touched them. She touches me, and I am touched by God, by Destiny. The whole of existence courses through her. I worship her. I am her slave. No freedom ever was so sweet. My love, I would stay with you forever, would spend my life within you. I would wait upon your every utterance and never ask the merest splinter of affection. Fate… Fate… I love you." Adam Susan - pages 37 -39 (http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/V_for_Vendetta 21:36 09/04/2012)
Adam Susan, believes that he is doing the right thing. He believes that freedom and individual liberties are luxuries that society neither need nor can afford. He believes that thanks to his efforts the people are untied and so are strong, and can progress into the new century. He is also portrayed as an unloved man, he even admits in that monologue that he is a virgin. He devotes himself to his ideals and to Fate, an A.I. computer system that monitors the entire country. Once Fate is revealed to be being controlled by V, he decides to love the public instead, however all too late as he is assassinated shortly after.
All in all, V for Vendetta is a great read, and I feel represents the ideologies of anarchism and fascism, at least from an anarchist perpective, very well. I have found it very helpful in my research and although i do think that it's message isn't very sutble at all, but then again does it need to be?, I intend to use it as a source of inspiration.
Below is a short video interveiw with Alan Moore, in which he discusses V for Vendetta.
For those who don't know and perhaps haven't had the good fortune to read this masterpiece, I'll quickly sum up the plot. Set in an alternate 1998 where following a war Great Britain has become a fascist state, controlled by a Nazi-esque political group call "Norsefire", it follows the story of Eve Hammond, a young prostitute who is saved and taken under the wing of the anarchistic terrorist known only as "V", who "educates" her whilst also carrying out an elaborate plot to take down the fascist regime and usher in a state of anarchy.
As I have said before, seeing as Alan Moore is a self-professed Anarchist, V for Vendetta is kinda Alan Moore's Ode to Anarchy, and as such a great source of research for me since it is an anarchist talking about anarchism as well as exploring fascism. Through the plot of the V for Vendetta Alan Moore talks about his beliefs regarding anarchy and fascism, exploring and questioning the morals of both.
[spoilers]
It questions the need for revolutionary violence and it's moral repercussions, after all V is a murderous terrorist, throughout the book he murders and bombs to achieve his goals. Interestingly Evey refuses to help V kill, "I won't do any more killing, V. Not even for you." - Eve, and in a marvellous monologue V explains how although violence is necessary to achieve his goals, it has no place within a "better world" and even goes so far as to organise his own execution because of what he has had to do to build a "better world".
"Anarchy wears two faces, both Creator and Destroyer. Thus Destroyers topple empires; make a canvas of clean rubble where creators can then build a better world. Rubble, once achieved makes further ruins' means irrelevant. Away with our explosives, then! Away with our Destroyers! They have no place within our better world. But let us raise a toast to all our bombers, all our bastards, most unlovely and most unforgivable, let's drink their health, then meet with them no more." - V - page 222 (http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/V_for_Vendetta 20:11 09/04/2012)
It addresses the idea that once the established hierarchy has been toppled chaos, looting and rioting will ensue. Once V removes the government's ability to listen, watch and address the public, looting and rioting does occur. Pointing out what may be obvious to some, that once people think no-one is looking they stop behaving, however V makes a clear distinction between this chaos and anarchy. He argues that this kind of disorder is a necessary phase that society must endure so that a state of anarchy can be achieved.
"All this riot and uproor, V... is this anarchy? Is this the land of do-as-you-please?" - Eve
"No. This is only the land of take-what-you-want. Anarchy means "without leaders"; not "without order." With anarchy comes an age of ordnung, of true order, which is to say voluntary order. This age of ordnung will begin when the mad and incoherent cycle of verwirrung that these bulletins reveal has run its course. This is not anarchy, Eve. This is chaos." - V- page 195
It goes on to argue that societies based around involuntary order, by their very nature, cause disorder.
"Involuntary order breeds dissatisfaction, mother of disorder; parent of the guillotine. Authoritarian societies are like formation skating. Intricate, mechanically precise and above all precarious. Beneath civilisation's fragile crust, cold chaos churns and there are places where the ice is treacherously thin." - V - page 197
It says that it is up to the people to choose between freedom or selfishness, that only by cooperating will people be able to move forward and progress, to make a better world.
"The people stand within the ruins of a society, a jail intended to out livge them all. The door is open. They can leave, or fall instead to squabbling and thence new salveries, the choice is theirs, as ever it must be." - Eve - page 260
It also explores the motives of a number of the fascist characters, the most interesting and telling of which is present as an internal monologue of the leader, Adam Susan.
"My name is Adam Susan. I am the leader. Leader of the lost, ruler of the ruins. I am a man, like any other man. I lead the country that I love out of the wilderness of the twentieth century. I believe in survival. In the destiny of the Nordic race. I believe in fascism. Oh yes, I am a fascist. What of it? Fascism…a word. A word whose meaning has been lost in the bleatings of the weak and the treacherous. the Romans invented fascism. A bundle of bound twigs was its symbol. One twig could be broken. A bundle would prevail. Fascism…strength in unity. I believe in strength. I believe in unity. And if that strength, that unity of purpose, demands a uniformity of thought, word and deed then so be it. I will not hear talk of freedom. I will not hear talk of individual liberty. They are luxuries. I do not believe in luxuries. The war put paid to luxury. The war put paid to freedom. The only freedom left to my people is the freedom to starve. The freedom to die, the freedom to live in a world of chaos. Should I allow them that freedom? I think not. I think not. Do I deserve for myself the freedom I deny to others? I do not. I sit here within my cage and I am but a servant. I, who am master of all that I see I see desolation. I see ashes. I have so very much. I have so very little. I am not loved, I know that. Not in soul or body. I have never known the soft whisper of endearment. Never known the peace that lies between the thighs of woman. But I am respected. I am feared. And that will suffice. Because I love. I, who am not loved in return. I have a love that is far deeper than the empty gasps and convulsions of brutish coupling. Shall I speak of her? Shall I speak of my bride? She has no eyes to flirt or promise. But she sees all. Sees and understands with a wisdom that is Godlike in its scale. I stand at the gates of her intellect and I am blinded by the light within. How stupid I must seem to her. How childlike and uncomprehending. Her soul is clean, untainted by the snares and ambiguities of emotion. She does not hate. She does not yearn. She is untouched by joy or sorrow. I worship her though I am not worthy. I cherish the purity of her disdain. She does not respect me. She does not fear me. She does not love me. They think she is hard and cold, those who do not know her. They think she is lifeless and without passion. They do not know her. She has not touched them. She touches me, and I am touched by God, by Destiny. The whole of existence courses through her. I worship her. I am her slave. No freedom ever was so sweet. My love, I would stay with you forever, would spend my life within you. I would wait upon your every utterance and never ask the merest splinter of affection. Fate… Fate… I love you." Adam Susan - pages 37 -39 (http://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/V_for_Vendetta 21:36 09/04/2012)
Adam Susan, believes that he is doing the right thing. He believes that freedom and individual liberties are luxuries that society neither need nor can afford. He believes that thanks to his efforts the people are untied and so are strong, and can progress into the new century. He is also portrayed as an unloved man, he even admits in that monologue that he is a virgin. He devotes himself to his ideals and to Fate, an A.I. computer system that monitors the entire country. Once Fate is revealed to be being controlled by V, he decides to love the public instead, however all too late as he is assassinated shortly after.
All in all, V for Vendetta is a great read, and I feel represents the ideologies of anarchism and fascism, at least from an anarchist perpective, very well. I have found it very helpful in my research and although i do think that it's message isn't very sutble at all, but then again does it need to be?, I intend to use it as a source of inspiration.
Below is a short video interveiw with Alan Moore, in which he discusses V for Vendetta.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)